We also recorded anecdotal feedback provided during conversations and meetings with our scholars. We kept a shared document in which we entered both highlights and opportunities for improvement. On a twice-annual basis, we reviewed and analyzed the data, looking for trends. If our process and programming were working for scholars, great! We continued with business as usual. These post-award surveys and anecdotal feedback helped us make many significant programmatic updates. For instance, we learned that even though we covered book expenses during award periods, many scholars struggled to pay for supplies vital to their courses of study.
Nursing students needed scrubs and stethoscopes, and chemistry students needed lab equipment. After learning more about these supply needs, we updated our policies to allow scholars to purchase them using their scholarship funding. In a single year, that one policy revision helped dozens of students reach their educational goals, allowing our organization to achieve our stated outcomes. Each summer, we conducted an alumni survey to understand the longer-term outcomes and impact of our programming on the women we served.
Questions included:. We assessed alumni survey results annually and reported on them in our annual program fact sheet and in other organizational and programmatic communications. We analyzed this information annually and shared highlights in our annual fact sheet and other communications. While evaluation can range from the simple to the extremely complex, I can attest that activities such as those described above went a long way towards helping my organization achieve its intent efficiently and effectively.
Whatever you come up with, I hope your program evaluation work helps you stay mission-focused while making meaningful changes to better serve your participants. This blog is an original work of the attributed author and is shared with permission via Foundant Technologies' website for informative purposes only as part of our educational content in the philanthropic sector. The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in this text belong solely to the author and do not necessarily reflect Foundant's stance on this topic.
If you have questions or comments, please reach out to our team. Foundant Technologies, Inc. Subscription Preferences Branding Kit. Toggle menubar Sector Education. Using the readings for the week, the South University Online Library, and the Internet for research, select scholarly references on three public health evaluation programs. You will use these references to support your responses.
Be sure to review public health programs in your state and include at least one program that addresses the health issue or health disease that you selected as your main theme or topic throughout the course. Use the following public health program matrix guide to analyze and interpret the three programs you selected. Click here to download the Matrix Guide. You will need to review, analyze, and interpret each program and use the matrix guide to address the following components:.
State the title of the public health program evaluation and its author. List the objectives and goals. Explain the purpose of the program summarize. Describe the method and research data collection process if applicable. The effect of the Louisiana Scholarship Program on college entrance. Do you get cream with your choice? Characteristics of students who moved into or out of the Louisiana Scholarship Program. A comprehensive summary of effects after three years. The effects of the Louisiana Scholarship Program on student achievement after three years.
Special education identification in the Louisiana Scholarship Program. Supplying choice: An analysis of school participation decisions in voucher programs in DC, Indiana, and Louisiana. A comprehensive summary of effects after two years.
0コメント